Massachusetts RMV Screws You Again, $5 at a Time!
I just learned of a new "policy" put in place at the Massachusetts' RMV branches, a $5 fee just for going there. That's right, want to go the RMV and do business? Well it's going to cost you $5 dollars more. Beginning March 1st, 2010 there will be a "$5 branch counter fee on licensing and registration transactions" according to the official web site. They call it an "incentive" for people to go online rather then drive to a branch to complete these transactions. I call it bulls**t.
First off, how about a $5 discount for using the online service? That's call an "incentive". Penalizing people for going to a branch is called a "deterrent". We all know that the greedy, grubby hands down at the RMV, DOT, and governor's office wouldn't think of offering to charge less for something. That's just silly. Secondly, you should be giving the poor people who have to go down to a RMV branch $5 just for having to deal with some of the state's worst employees. Most of the people I have dealt with down there are nasty and rude, not to mention they seem put out when you ask them to do their job. There have been some exceptions, but they are by far the exception.
This has to stop. The state just keeps asking for more and more and continues to give less and less. We need to start holding our elected officials accountable for this nonsense. Unfortunately I believe we need to remove them from office. The fact is the elected officials today have a mindset that they can do anything they want and the people of this state will just take it. We need to start sending messages to beacon hill, continue your nonsense and you'll be out of a job.
Next time you vote I hope you remember all the fees and taxes the state charges you and the very little you get in return. I know I will.
Ref: Effective March 1, Online, Mail & Automated Services Will Cost Less than Branch Services
Will Any Martha Do For Massachusetts (or is it Massachusettes)?
I recently saw an attack add from Martha Coakley (one of many she runs, since she can't stand on her own phantom accomplishments) that said "This Bush is Brown, this Brown is Bush." In it she panders to the undereducated who don't have the mental capacity to think on their own. You know, those people who shouted "anybody but Bush" during the last presidential election. Boy, don't you wish you were at least shouting "Anybody with a brain and some common sense who loves our country even a little bit and won’t make us the laughingstock of the world, but Bush" now? BTW, nice move there.
Anyway, I thought I'd do an attack ad with the equivalent intellectual prowess the “This Bush is Brown” ad. Here it is:
This Martha is a crook. This crook is a Martha.
Both of these women have robbed people of their personal property. One by lying, cheating, and being downright dishonorable. The other by lying, cheating, and being downright dishonorable. By continuing to support either one you send the message that lying, cheating, and being dishonorable is how you want your country to be. It will continue to corrupt our great country and continue to cost us more. Here is a quick comparison:
|
|
|
|
|
Martha Stewart |
Martha Coakley |
Scott Brown |
|
| Has unrealistic view of the world: | True | True | False |
| Knows nothing about foreign policy: | True | True | False |
| Is unqualified for public office: | True | True | False |
| Has served time in federal prison for a felony: | True | Not Yet | False |
As you can see, neither Martha is right for this state. Make sure on January 19th you don’t pick a Martha.
Court rules for government in plea deal dispute, can’t trust government, again.
Here is the short story. Some guy made a deal to get a shorter sentence and plead guilty (happens all the time) but between making the deal and the end of the trial he (allegedly?) committed another crime. So the government said "screw you" and, rather then hold up their end of the deal, decided to screw him at closing and recommended the longest sentence possible. The judge agreed and put him away. The guy, having held up his end of the deal, was pretty annoyed and wanted to rescind his "guilty" plea. Well, the always fair and reasonable courts said, "No."
Did this guy deserve his sentence? Maybe. Highly likely even. That's not really the point. The point is the government is saying the government doesn't need to keep its promises or honor its agreements. Ask a 5 year old, he'll tell you that isn't really fair. It is just another example of how we can't put our trust in the government.
H.R. 1542: We’re gonna take your property!!
Well, the crazyness has started!!! Check out HR 1542. This isn't fiction people, this is real life...they are going to start taking the property of US workers.
"To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a 100 percent tax on bonuses paid by businesses that receive TARP assistance and are majority owned by the Federal Government."
Peopel to thank:



